Please notice: On this article, the time period ‘ladies’ is used inclusively to embody all people who menstruate or have menstruated, no matter gender id.
Let’s be clear: Entry to actual, evidence-based well being data shouldn’t be controversial—however right here we’re.
In a political local weather the place ladies’s our bodies are always beneath fireplace, the quiet erasure of greater than 8,000 pages from federal well being web sites isn’t simply suspicious—it’s harmful.
These aren’t simply random webpages; they’re important sources on every thing from contraception and maternal mortality to LGBTQ+ youth well being and medical trial range. The form of data that saves lives, helps suppliers, and empowers folks to make knowledgeable selections about their our bodies.
And now? It’s gone—scrubbed from websites just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA with little rationalization and 0 accountability. If that feels like a warfare on ladies, effectively… you’re not fallacious.
When politics begins dictating what well being data we’re allowed to entry, it’s as much as us to combat again. Meaning getting louder, getting smarter, and turning to unbiased, science-backed ladies’s well being sources that put public well being earlier than political agendas. As a result of nobody—not a politician, not a bureaucrat—will get to determine what we do or don’t need to learn about our personal rattling our bodies.
Why Authorities-Provided Well being Information is Disappearing
For many years, federal well being companies just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA had been go-to sources for reliable medical data. However in current months, one thing alarming has occurred behind the scenes: 1000’s of pages of ladies’s well being content material have quietly vanished.
This isn’t a coincidence—it’s a calculated shift.
Right here’s what’s been eliminated, why it issues, and who’s being harmed essentially the most.
What’s Been Eliminated and Why It Issues
Entry to complete, research-based well being and wellness data is important to the well-being of ladies. But the U.S. authorities has not too long ago modified or eliminated greater than 8,000 pages1,2,4 from federal well being web sites—severely limiting entry to essential medical steerage.
These deletions have an effect on sources from the Nationwide Institutes of Well being (NIH), the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC), and the Meals and Drug Administration (FDA). This contains important public well being data on subjects similar to HIV and sexually transmitted illnesses, contraceptive utilization and security, medical trial range, maternal mortality and morbidity, transgender well being, and LGBTQ+ youth well being.1,2,3,4.
Who This Impacts Most
The suppression of this data disproportionately impacts ladies, minorities, and different marginalized people.
With out these sources, sufferers, healthcare suppliers, and researchers face important challenges in making knowledgeable choices about remedy choices, preventive care, and wellness methods.
Eradicating this content material doesn’t simply prohibit entry to information—it undermines progress in gender-specific medical analysis and healthcare fairness.
[SIDEBAR: In December 2024, a report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) found that the NIH has consistently failed to prioritize and fund research on women’s health.ⶠThe report called for an additional $16 billion in funding to close the gap.But with the current administration’s clear bias—and what some are calling an outright war on women—the likelihood of that funding materializing is slim to none.]
Fortuitously, there are advocates on the market working to archive this data and make it obtainable to the general public5. This text accommodates a listing of those recovered sources.
The Political Undermining of Public Well being
Whereas the transition of presidency from one get together to a different shouldn’t have an effect on the supply of evidence-based well being and wellness data, it has. This alarming development highlights the pressing want for unbiased, non-governmental sources of evidence-based well being sources.
The Position of Advocacy Organizations
Fortunately, not all hope is misplaced. Organizations just like the Society for Girls’s Well being Analysis (SWHR) are main the cost to guard and advance ladies’s well being by coverage, training, and science.
For instance, SWHR is dedicated to making sure that the “Intercourse as a Organic Variable†coverage stays in place on the NIH—a vital step in making certain that illnesses, therapies, and medical interventions are researched with ladies’s distinctive physiology in thoughts.
The well being wants of ladies change throughout the lifespan, from reproductive years by menopause and past, making entry to stage-specific, research-backed sources much more vital.
Trusted, Proof-Primarily based Girls’s Well being Sources
Beneath is a curated listing of evidence-based, non-governmental sources. These organizations present science-backed steerage tailor-made to the distinctive well being issues of ladies of their reproductive years, through the menopausal transition, and post-menopause. By searching for out and sharing these sources, we will collectively safeguard entry to important well being information and be certain that all ladies have the data they should thrive at each stage of life.
Teen/Reproductive Years:Â
Reproductive Well being Entry Mission
Trains and helps major care clinicians to broaden entry to reproductive well being care—together with abortion, contraception, and miscarriage care. Presents free, multilingual, evidence-based affected person training supplies and advocates for fairness in medical coaching and care.
Perimenopause/Menopause:
The North American Menopause Society
A number one unbiased group providing evidence-based data on menopause and midlife ladies’s well being. A trusted useful resource for each healthcare suppliers and the general public.
A number of Life Phases:
The American School of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
A go-to supply for dependable, science-backed ladies’s well being data. Empowers sufferers to have knowledgeable conversations with their ob-gyn and take an energetic position of their care.
Deliberate Parenthood
A nationwide chief in accessible sexual and reproductive healthcare and training. Advocates for reasonably priced, high-quality providers and is the most important supplier of intercourse training within the U.S.
Our Our bodies Ourselves
Presents rigorously vetted well being and sexuality data that integrates medical experience with lived expertise. Prioritizes inclusivity and facilities the voices of ladies and gender-expansive people.
Wholesome Girls
Centered on ladies aged 35 to 64, this group supplies medically reviewed, evidence-based content material that helps wholesome getting older and empowered self-advocacy.
Massachusetts Normal Hospital Heart for Girls’s Psychological Well being: Reproductive Psychiatry Useful resource & Info Heart
Presents reproductive psychiatry sources throughout life phases, with specialised assist for BIPOC people searching for culturally aligned care.
Heart for Science within the Public Curiosity
A science-based advocacy group selling public well being by vitamin, meals coverage reform, and transparency. Prioritizes illness prevention and meals fairness.
Take Cost: Keep Knowledgeable, Keep Empowered
In a time when entry to reliable well being data is being stripped away, staying knowledgeable isn’t simply vital—it’s a type of resistance. Each individual deserves science-backed, inclusive sources that assist knowledgeable selections, not political agendas.
So bookmark these hyperlinks. Share them with your pals, your purchasers, your healthcare suppliers. Help the organizations doing the laborious work to maintain this data alive. And above all, don’t let anybody inform you that your well being isn’t value combating for. As a result of it’s. All the time. —Karin
References
- https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/02/upshot/trump-government-websites-missing-pages.html
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/31/federal-agencies-websites-trump/
- https://swhr.org/a-january-2025-policy-recap-from-swhr/
- https://www.reuters.com/enterprise/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-drops-web-pages-improving-clinical-trial-diversity-2025-01-24/
- https://contrarian.substack.com/p/public-health-websites-are-going
- https://www.science.org/content material/article/nih-needs-new-institute-women-s-health-research-expert-panel-says